) CN7 CN2 CN5 CN6 CN1 CN3 CN4 CN8 EU Interviewees (EU
) CN7 CN2 CN5 CN6 CN1 CN3 CN4 CN8 EU Interviewees (EU) EU7 EU5 EU3 EU1 EU4 EU6 EU2 EUInformed consent was obtained from all interviewees. The Cholesteryl sulfate custom synthesis interview script was translated by a Chinese colleague into simplified Chinese characters and then back translated to English by a second Chinese colleague and reviewed by the interviewer for accuracy to make sure that when delivered in Chinese, the translation will be correct. The interview was delivered by phone in the Chinese script straight for the Chinese interviewee via a translator who carried out all of those interviews. Responses to every question have been verbally translated by the same translator throughout the interview, along with the responses audio recorded in English. The European pilot was delivered by telephone in English along with the data audio recorded and after that transcribed in English. The interview script was initially piloted with two subjects (CN1 and EU1). The interview scripts have been then refined to lessen query numbers because the interview duration was deemed to become too extended (over 40 min), and minor edits in format and syntax were made towards the script to minimize the will need for any verbal clarification. However, the content in the interview script was not substantively changed soon after piloting (Supplementary Material). All interviews had been conducted by telephone working with the methodology described for the pilot interviews, and whilst following the scripts, interviewees had been encouraged to expand on points of interest–for example where queries could be answered `yes’ or `no’ (e.g., have you received any precise education for the job inside the zoo’) interviewees answering within the affirmative have been then asked to give examples, or if an interviewee expressed a specific viewpoint, they could be asked `why’. Interviews have been recorded by Dictaphone and recordings of interview responses have been transcribed professionally (University Transcriptions, TP Transcription Restricted, UK) and responses have been cleaned, with contextual info added in square brackets to make sure clarity of meaning. ForJ. Zool. Bot. Gard. 2021,example, when answering a query for instance `what do you GNF6702 Protocol comprehend by the term animal welfare’ the interviewer may well respond with `it is . . . xxxx’. Within this context, square brackets may be added to clarify the context from the answer, e.g., `it [Animal welfare] is . . . xxx’. Care was taken to make sure that at no time was the which means with the text changed, nor had been any errors in grammar or syntax corrected. Transcribed interview information had been cross-checked against the original audio recordings for accuracy. Interviews continued until information saturation (the point at which no new codes emerge) was reached. Information have been separated into European and Chinese datasets. Each and every interview script was coded working with NVIVO 11 (QRS International, London, UK) with both a priori codes derived from analysis inquiries, and coding of emergent themes arising in the decontextualised interview data. Coding comprises three major stages: (1) immersion, exactly where the researcher begins analysis early in the data collection approach by listening to audio and/or reading transcripts, and using free-association considering or `memos’ (memoing) to ensure familiarity and after that to create insights and connections amongst the data; (2) reduction, where the study data are decreased and organised into categories, typically through the creation of `nodes’ or `codes’ “the most basic segment, or element, from the raw data which may be assessed within a meaningful way with regards to the pheno.
